Before being a great writer, one has to gain fame -- at least has passed years of experience in being famed from her/his writing. Below is my poetic comment on Katerina B's question above:
How could one be a great writer,
If s/he hasn't gained her/his fame,
From her/his writing in any form,
To have her/his renowned name?
Thus, the answer does seem the same,
"Is a famous writer better than a great one?"
The question's what that is like a life game,
As if all has been coherent to things done.
Tho' 'Great' is as of spiritual prestige,
Whilst 'Famous' is seen of outcome won,
Both are integral parts one has to seize,
Just to make a Famous and Great One.
For 'Famous', the public are judgemental,
As a 'Great' work is surely a writer's son
'Greatness' is all talented and instrumental,
'Fame' judged by the public can be just a fun.
"In short, Fame can be wealthy whilst Greatness may not."
No comments:
Post a Comment